Impact of IBC on Foreign Direct Investment

Having a clear and efficient insolvency process reduces the perceived risk for foreign investors, as they are more confident about recovering their investments if a company they invest in faces financial difficulties. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) streamlines the insolvency process, leading to a quicker resolution, which positively impacts investor sentiment and encourages new investments. The insolvency framework in the IBC can significantly enhance investor confidence by providing clear legal protections and a transparent process for resolving bankruptcies, thereby making a country more attractive for IBC on Foreign Direct Investment.

The Role of IBC on Foreign Direct Investment

Introduction to IBC’s Framework:

The IBC framework provides a comprehensive system for resolving insolvency cases involving companies, partnership firms, and individuals. It ensures a time-bound process while balancing the interests of all stakeholders, including creditors and debtors, by facilitating efficient debt restructuring or liquidation when necessary. The IBC  IBC aligns with the global insolvency framework,  making it an investor-friendly legislation, aligning with international insolvency best practices.

Reassurance for Investors:

The IBC establishes the rights of the creditors in the insolvency process. This effectively reduces any uncertainties for foreign investors in distressed companies. Therefore, it encourages IBC on Foreign Direct Investment by offering structured and transparent frameworks for asset recovery and restructuring.

Read more : Principle of Equitable Treatment Under Insolvency Law

Balancing Investor and Creditor Rights:

One of the aims of the IBC is to balance the interests of the stakeholders during the insolvency process, including cross-border cases. By balancing the interests of operational creditors and equity investors, the IBC ensures equitable treatment. The role of FDI is crucial in resolving the financial issues of distressed companies. The IBC can address any complexities in cross-border investments. 

Foreign Direct Investment and Insolvency

Role of IBC on Foreign Direct Investment:

The IBC provides a robust and transparent insolvency framework, instilling confidence in international investors by assuring them of efficient recovery. Reassuring foreign investors on their capital safety during insolvency cases and the process under the IBC, ensures quicker resolution and recovery, making India an attractive FDI destination.

Read more: Advancing CIRP Fraud Detection in Public Sector Entities

Case Studies and Judicial Decisions:

The Supreme Court ordered the liquidation of Jet Airways (India) Limited on November 7, 2024. This case demonstrated the importance of FDI in reviving distressed assets through efficient insolvency proceedings. Through judicial precedents, India’s insolvency system has reinforced FDI’s critical role in ensuring corporate restructuring under IBC.

Impact on Investment Climate:

FDI directly supplements the domestic capital and brings technology and skill to the sectors of direct entry. This can stimulate economic development by creating jobs, boosting local industries, and increasing export potential. Therefore, it encourages a shift in global perception toward India as a safe investment destination.

Types of Foreign Investment Instruments and Their IBC Interplay

Equity Investments: Under the IBC, equity investments are considered junior to debt instruments, meaning that in case of insolvency, debt holders will be prioritised for repayment before equity investors receive any returns. Such equity holders may face subordination during insolvency, creating complexities in the resolution process. In India, foreign investors often opt for equity to gain ownership and influence in distressed entities.

Debt Instruments:

When a foreign investor uses debt instruments, like bonds or loans, to invest in an Indian company, it is considered FDI through debt. Debt instruments used for FDI are generally classified as “financial debt” giving the investor the right to initiate insolvency proceedings against an Indian company if it defaults on the debt payments. FDI through external commercial borrowings (ECBs) is subject to the IBC’s creditor rights framework and debt investors receive priority in repayment during insolvency resolutions.

Hybrid Instruments:

Hybrid instruments as a mode of investment have been by investors to enable them to benefit from a regular return in the form of running interest. For instance, convertible bonds and preference shares provide foreign investors with both security and flexibility, though their treatment under IBC remains nuanced.

Challenges in Reconciling IBC on Foreign Direct Investment with IBC

Cross-Border Complexities: Establishing jurisdiction over a foreign company undergoing insolvency proceedings can be challenging, leading to lengthy legal battles. Further, it may be difficult to coordinate insolvency proceedings across multiple jurisdictions can be complex and time-consuming. The differences in insolvency laws between countries pose challenges for foreign investors. Having a lack of a unified framework for cross-border insolvency hinders seamless resolution.

Investor Awareness and Participation:

Foreign investors often lack clarity about their rights under IBC, meaning they may not be able to take the correct preventive actions in the applicable legislation. Therefore, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) must introduce awareness campaigns and standardized processes to bridge the gap

Valuation Disputes:

Insolvency cases that involve handling FDIs, also handle foreign financial investors. This means that disagreements over asset valuation during insolvency can arise, deterring foreign investors. It is a necessity to establish transparent valuation mechanisms to foster trust among stakeholders and investors’ confidence in the resolution process. 

Judicial and Policy Developments in FDI and IBC

Courts have consistently emphasized the need to balance foreign investor rights and insolvency objectives. The Jet Airways case highlighted the complexities of cross-border insolvency under the IBC when the company faced parallel insolvency proceedings in India and the Netherlands. The court in the Essar Steel case emphasized the importance of equitable treatment for creditors, including foreign investors. A significant step towards evolving cross-border insolvency cases. The provisions in UNICITRAL’s Model Law was designed to boost investor confidence and simplify the norms of the FDI for distressed assets, bolstering ease of doing business.

FAQs

1. How does attract IBC on Foreign Direct Investment?

The IBC attracts foreign investment by providing a streamlined and time-bound process for resolving distressed assets, allowing foreign investors to acquire valuable assets at discounted prices through corporate restructuring. 

2. What role does FDI play in insolvency resolution?

FDI plays a crucial role in insolvency resolution by providing a potential source of capital for distressed companies undergoing restructuring, enabling a more efficient resolution process, and enhancing investor confidence. 

3. What are the challenges foreign investors face in IBC proceedings?

Due to the complexity of insolvency cases, foreign investors have difficulties in identifying and valuing assets located overseas, coordinating proceedings across multiple jurisdictions, and navigating potential legal ambiguities regarding which country’s laws apply. This potentially hinders their ability to effectively recover debts in insolvency situations.

4. How does the introduction of cross-border insolvency laws impact FDI?

Cross-border insolvency laws positively impact FDI by providing greater certainty and protection for foreign investors, as it ensures a more streamlined process for managing insolvent companies with assets across multiple jurisdictions, thereby mitigating risks associated with cross-border investments and encouraging more FDI inflows. 

Conclusion

The IBC has a positive impact on FDI by establishing a clear and efficient insolvency resolution framework, which significantly reduces risk for foreign investors. Hence, it boosts confidence in investing in India due to the predictability and protection offered by the legal system. This is particularly important as it mitigates concerns related to potential debt defaults and lengthy legal disputes that could arise during investments. The interface between the IBC between IBC and IBC on Foreign Direct Investment instruments is critical for fostering economic stability and growth. As India continues to refine its insolvency laws, IBC on Foreign Direct Investment will play an increasingly pivotal role in reviving distressed assets. The functioning of the IBC signals to potential foreign investors that their investment are less risky due to the streamlined mechanisms for recovering debts if a company goes insolvent.